AI Act Check

How risky is your use of AI?

Three questions about role, purpose and decisions about people are enough for a first assessment of your risk class and obligations under the AI Act.

AI Act Check

Use our free AI Act Check.

Question 1 of 3

How do you use AI?

Your role determines which EU AI Act obligations apply.

Question 2 of 3

What is the AI used for?

The purpose decides the risk class.

Question 3 of 3

Does the AI make or support decisions about people?

E.g. candidate selection, creditworthiness or access to services, the strongest high-risk trigger (Annex III).

How we process your input is explained in our privacy policy.

Please note: The result of this check is a free, automated first assessment and therefore a rough indication only. It does not replace a review of the individual case or legal advice. We accept no liability for the accuracy or completeness of the result.

Background

Two roles, four risk classes.

The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) ties obligations to your role and to the risk of the system. The GDPR applies in parallel as soon as personal data is processed.

Clarify your role first

Most companies are deployers of third-party AI systems, not their providers. Anyone who develops or substantially modifies AI becomes a provider with considerably higher obligations.

The four risk classes

  • Unacceptable risk (Art. 5 EU AI Act, prohibited since February 2025)
  • High risk (Annex III, e.g. recruitment, credit scoring)
  • Limited risk with transparency obligations (Art. 50 EU AI Act)
  • Minimal risk (the vast majority of applications)

The application timeline

  • In force since August 2024
  • Prohibited practices since February 2025
  • Obligations for general-purpose AI since August 2025
  • Most remaining obligations from August 2026

Background

AI labelling duties from 2 August 2026.

From 2 August 2026 the Regulation applies generally, and with it Art. 50 EU AI Act. The provision addresses providers and deployers separately, which is why the check above asks for your role first.

Provider duties

  • Art. 50(1): systems interacting directly with people must be designed so the AI is recognisable, unless that is obvious anyway.
  • Art. 50(2): generators must mark synthetic audio, image, video and text output in a machine-readable way (watermarks, metadata). Exception: purely assistive functions that do not substantially alter the input.

Deployer duties, this is what affects most companies

  • Art. 50(3): emotion recognition and biometric categorisation: inform the people concerned.
  • Art. 50(4): disclose deep fakes. For text only where published to inform the public on matters of public interest, and not even then if a human reviewed it and holds editorial responsibility.
  • Art. 50(5): clearly and distinguishably, at the latest at the first interaction, and accessible.

Deep fake or not? Three elements must coincide

Under Art. 3(60) EU AI Act a deep fake is AI-generated or manipulated image, audio or video content that resembles existing persons, objects, places, entities or events and would falsely appear authentic. If one element is missing there is no deep fake, and no disclosure duty for deployers.

  • Requires disclosure: AI video showing the face of a real person; an AI voice of a managing director; a manipulated photo of a real event.
  • Does not: invented illustrations and stock-style imagery without real-world reference; AI-generated source code; internal texts, proposals and presentations; ordinary marketing copy; editorially reviewed publications.

Breaches of Art. 50 EU AI Act can be fined under Art. 99(4)(g) EU AI Act with up to EUR 15 million or 3 % of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.

Need advice on data protection?

Result shows action is needed? We assess your AI use under the GDPR and the EU AI Act and support implementation.

Frequent questions

What clients often ask.

Do we have to label AI-generated graphics or source code?
Usually not. The deployer disclosure duty under Art. 50(4) of the EU AI Act covers deep fakes. AI image, audio or video resembling existing persons, places or events that could falsely appear authentic (Art. 3(60) EU AI Act). An invented illustration does not meet that, and source code is not image, audio or video content at all. The machine-readable marking under Art. 50(2) EU AI Act binds the provider of the AI system, not you as the user.
Who does the EU AI Act apply to?
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 applies to providers and deployers of AI systems with an EU nexus. Most companies are deployers because they use ready-made AI tools. Anyone who develops or substantially modifies AI is a provider with considerably higher obligations.
What are the four risk classes?
Unacceptable risk (Art. 5 EU AI Act, prohibited since February 2025), high risk (Annex III, e.g. AI in recruitment or credit scoring), limited risk with transparency obligations (Art. 50 EU AI Act, e.g. chatbots and AI-generated content) and minimal risk (the vast majority of applications).
When does the EU AI Act apply?
It entered into force in August 2024 and applies in stages: prohibited practices since February 2025, obligations for general-purpose AI since August 2025, and most remaining obligations from August 2026.
What fines can be imposed?
Up to €35m or 7% of worldwide annual turnover for prohibited AI practices, and up to €15m or 3% for other breaches, whichever is higher.